Hattip abbreviation1/6/2024 Crucially, the success of live tweeting depends on the ability of scientists to relay the highlights of a talk or to string together multiple tweets such that they can also be read as a contiguous narrative using tools such as Storify. Obviously, it is also in the best interests of conference organizers to provide free Wi-Fi so that international attendees do not have to use their expensive data plans and because the phone signal in many conference venues is generally weak. We suggest that conference live tweeting is an opportunity to reach beyond those in the room while enabling feedback from those outside. This reticence is probably more likely due to ignorance of the potential rather than the possibility of loss of attendee revenue. Surprisingly few conferences are actively encouraging scientists to tweet. From our own experiences of attending and live tweeting at several conferences over the past three years, the success of live tweeting appears dependent on the engagement of conference organizers with Twitter and its active encouragement before, during, and after the meeting. Increasingly, some scientists are using Twitter as a vehicle to summarize presentations and posters at conferences in real time, which is defined as “live tweeting.” The advantage of remote participation is that the information tweeted is open and free to anyone around the globe ( Figure 1). Ideally, it would be preferable to monitor conferences remotely and at minimal or no cost. The time and cost expenditures required to physically participate in conferences necessitate an alternative route to access the information presented and capture it for future reference. In some fields, the number of conferences to attend is overwhelming. If he or she is fortunate, a scientist may attend one or more scientific conferences in a year. Twitter can additionally serve as a catalyst in the development of scientific tools, with at least one mobile app for science coming directly out of a tweet at a scientific conference. Like other professionals, scientists are increasingly tweeting about their own research and the work of colleagues and sharing links to scholarly publications, laboratory results, and related scientific content such as molecular structures. Twitter has useful real-world scientific applications, such as in disease surveillance enabling the tracking of disease pandemics –, as well as the capacity to be used for the communication of science itself. Twitter is a popular microblogging platform famously limited to messages of up to 140 characters and represents a simple way to express what's on your mind to a global audience of followers. The software applications installed on them do not necessarily have to be specialized to be useful for science, e.g., Evernote can be used as an electronic lab notebook. The power of mobile communications has increased dramatically in recent years such that these devices (smartphone or tablet computer) can be used productively to do science.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |